The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rejected claims that certain funds in the Barrick 401(k) plan were offered in needlessly expensive share classes, saying that these allegations didn’t account for the fact that the plan received discounted recordkeeping services in exchange for using the allegedly pricier share class.
Plaintiffs Cole Matney and Paul Watts argued that the propriety of this arrangement turns on factual questions that can’t be ...
Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:
Learn About Bloomberg Law
AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.
Already a subscriber?
Log in to keep reading or access research tools.